Main Article Content

Abstract




Every human is a problem solver. Humans always have to deal with different kinds of problems that needs to be resolved. We have our own way to solve our problem even if they face the same one. This is because humans have different cognitive style. How a person sees and solves his/her problems shows their cognitive style. The way we solve a problem is also can be an indicator of how creative a person is. Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation (KAI) Inventory was created to measure creativity style. This research was dedicated to adapt into Indonesian version of KAI Inventory. We used convenience sampling method and got 164 participants. We did measurement model for the conirmatory factor analysis. Then the psychometric tests have been done to ensure its reliability and validity. Based on the results of Inter-item Correlation, Correlation With Another Tests method, and Factor Analysis showed that Indonesian version of KAI Inventory was reliable but still needs some revision on its items to increase its validity.




Keywords

construct validation factor analysis creativity style Kirton adaptation Innovation Inventory test adaptation validasi konstruk faktor analisis gaya kreativitas inventori adaptasi Inovasi Kirton adaptasi alat ukur

Article Details

How to Cite
Tobing, G., Angelina, V. E., Franceline, D., Anwar, M. Y., Suwartono, C., & Halim, M. (2020). Construct validity of the Indonesian version of Kirton`s Adaptaion-Innovation Inventory. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology, 1(2), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu19

References

  1. Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1 (3), 185-216.
  2. De Vellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. California: Sage.
  3. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting Educational and Psychological
  4. Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Hughes, M. A. (1994). Myers-Briggs Type Indicators and Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory Correlations. Executive Research Project. Washington DC: The Industrial College of the Armed Forces National Defense University.
  6. Isaksen, S. G. & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-Innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The Level-Style Issue Revisited. Psychological Reports, 63, 659-670.
  7. Johnson, R. C. (2003). Study of the Relationship Between Cognitive Styles of Creativity and Personality Types of Military Leaders. Proquest Dissertations and Theses.
  8. Kaplan, R. M. & Sacuzzo, D. P. (1982). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues (3rd Ed.). California: Brooks/Cole.
  9. Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629.
  10. Lattanzio, G. A. (2002). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Meets the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory: An Executive Summary of Sundell’s 1999 Master’s Project. State University of New York, International Center for Studies in Creativity.
  11. Mudrika, N .(2009). Skala MBTI. Diunduh online 21 September 2012 pada http://naismudrika.wordpress.com
  12. Okolo, E. N. (1991). Health Research Design and Methodology. USA: CRC Press.
  13. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub.
  14. Riyanti, B. P. D. (2001). Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Skala Kecil di DKI dan DIY. Disertasi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
  15. Stum, J. (2009). Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation Theory: Managing Cognitive Styles in Times of Diversity and Change. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 2 Iss(1), 66-78.
  16. Internet