Neutrality in religiosity studies in Indonesia
Keywords:
Indonesia, neutrality in religious studies, religion, religiosityAbstract
Religiosity studies in Indonesia is an interesting topic; however, one of the biggest challenges in studying religiosity in Indonesia is the neutrality of the researcher regardless of their attitudes toward religion. This editorial note will explore the meaning of neutrality in religiosity studies. Specifically, it emphasizes the responsibility of the researchers to understand the complexity of religion by acknowledging that religion can have a positive impact and/or negative effect on believers. Furthermore, the present note describes how studies on the psychology of religion in Indonesia can contribute to the body of knowledge not only at the local level, but also at the global context.
Downloads
References
Charity Aid Foundation. (2021, Juni). CAF world giving index 2021: A pandemic special. https://www.cafonline.org/about-us/publications/2021-publications/caf-world-giving-index-2021
Comte, A. (1880). A general view of positivism. Reeves & Turner.
El Hafiz, S., & Aditya, Y. (2021). Kajian literatur sistematis penelitian religiusitas di Indonesia: Istilah, definisi, pengukuran, hasil kajian, serta rekomendasi. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24854/ijpr428
Fridayanti, F., & Fitriah, E. A. (2020). Why and how am I angry? Exploring the causes and expressions of anger of the Islamic Sundanese adolescents. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 8(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu193
Gebauer, J. E., Bleidorn, W., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Lamb, M. E., & Potter, J. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in big five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 1064-1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037683
InterNations. (2021). Expat Insider 2021: The best and worst places to feel at home abroad. https://www.internations.org/expat-insider/2021/ease-of-settling-in-index-40110
Istiqomah, I. (2015). Hubungan antara religiusitas dengan kepuasan perkawinan. Jurnal Psikologi, 11(2), 71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jp.v11i2.1396
Johnson, D. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods: A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Human Nature, 16(4), 410–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0
Pargament, K. I. (2002). Is religion nothing but ...? Explaining religion versus explaining religion away. Psychological Inquiry, 13(3), 239–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449341
Pargament, K. I., & Lomax, J. W. (2013). Understanding and addressing religion among people with mental illness. World Psychiatry, 12(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20005
Paul, D. B. (1988). The selection of the "survival of the fittest". Journal of the History of Biology, 21(3), 411–424.
Rios, K., Cheng, Z. H., Totton, R. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause Christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615598378
Ruslan, C., Ariela, J., & Sutanto, S. H. (2020). Pengaruh religiositas terhadap kepuasan pernikahan pada orangtua yang memiliki anak dengan Down syndrome. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 7(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu02019-298
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
Transparancy International. (2020). Corruption perception index 2020. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl
Wood, G. (2013). The rationality of heuristic religious belief. Dalam G. W. Dawes & J. Maclaurin (Eds.), A new science of religion (hlm. 189–204). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Subhan El Hafiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) for the exposure of their work with an acknowledgement of Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology (JPU) as an outlet of their published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.