The virtue values: Kindness, loyalty, and piety in the Melayu cultural context
Keywords:
kindness, loyalty, virtues, relationAbstract
The belief in good values that live in the community have an influence on the individual’s behavior. Virtue is one of them. Virtues found to have links with the individual’s character and personality. By using the approach of constructive realism indigenous psychology, this study aims to explore the virtues in the context of Melayu culture. Data collection techniques in this study were open ended questions and multiple responses. Data were analyzed with qualitative and quantitative methods using NVivo. It was found that kindness and loyalty are the core virtues that are considered important in everyday life. In the relationship context, the behaviors target of these values is higher in the community than personal. Virtues was found to be differ according to the demands of the situation. These virtues shifted in problem solving situations, where kindness and empathy are expected to appear less than serenity and resourceful. It is clear that the virtues which embraced by the individual does not always manifest if the situation is not supportive for the emergence of these virtues.
Downloads
References
Annas, J. (2003). Virtue Ethics and Social Psychology. A Priori, 2, 20–33
Baehr, J. (2013). Educating for Intellectual Virtues: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 248-262.
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy,14(4), 394–419.
Cawley, M.J., Martin, J.E., &Johnson, J.A. (2000). A virtues approach to personality. Personality and
Individual Differences, 28(2000), 997-1013.
Cornwell, J.F McCullough. (2014). The Principled Pursuit of Happiness: Virtue’s Role in Moral
Psychology (Dissertation). New York, NY: Columbia University.
Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., Seligman, M.E.P. (2005). Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued
Human Strengths Across Culture and History. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203–213.
Emmons, R. A. (2003). Personal Goals, Life Meaning, And Virtue: Wellsprings Of A Positive Life. Dalam C.L.M. Keyes (Ed.), Flourishing: The positive person and the good life (hlm. 105-128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Epstein, Seymour & O’Brien, Edward, J. (1985). The person–situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin,98(3), 513-537.
Fowers, B. J. (2005). Virtue and Psychology: Pursuing Excellence in Ordinary Practices. Washington, DC: APA Press.
. (2012). Placing Virtue and the Human Good in Psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 1-9.
. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 10-23.
. (2014). Assessing Virtue: Lessons from Subfields of Psychology. These are unpublished conference papers for the Jubilee Centre for Character and Values at Oriel College, Thursday 9th – Saturday 11th January 2014.
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Politics And Religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Book.
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus Fall, 55-66.
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: Studies in deceit (vol.1). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Hartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Maller, J. B. (1929). Studies in the nature of character: Studies in self- control, vol. 2. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Hartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Shuttleworth, F. K. (1930). Studies in the nature of character. Studies in the organization of character (vol. 3). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Jost, J.T. & Jost, L.J. (2009). Virtue ethics and the social psychology of character: Philosophical lessons from the person–situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2009), 253–254.
Kamtekar, R. (2004). Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character.Ethics, 114, 458–491.
Kramer, D. A. (2000). Wisdom as a classical source of human strength: Conceptualization and empirical inquiry. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 83–101.
Oudenhavan, J.P., Raad, B., Carmona, C., Helbig, A., Linden, M. (2012). Are Virtues Shaped by National Cultures or Religions?. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 29–34.
Oudenhoven, J.P., Raad, B., Timmerman, M.E., Askevis-Leherpeux, F., Boski, P., Carmona, C., Choubisa, R., Dominguez, A.C., Bye, H.H., Kurlyo, A., Lahnmann, C., Mastor, K., Selenko, E., Slezackova, A., Smoith, R., Tip, L., Yik, M. (2014). Are virtues national, supranational, or universal?. SpringerPlus, 3(223), 1-12.
Peterson, C. & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtue: A Handbook and Classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(4), 441–452.
Schnall, E., Schiffman, M., & Cherniak, A. (2014). Values That Transcend: Positive Psychology In Jewish Texts And Tradition. In C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and spirituality across cultures. New York, NY: Springer.
Seligman, M.E.P. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press/Simon and Schuster.
Shryack, J., Steger, M.F., Krueger, R.F., &Kallie, C.S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2010), 714–719.
Walshe, M. (1995). The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of Digha Nikaya (Teachings of the Buddha). Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Dede Fitriana Anatassia, Mira Noor Milla, Subhan El Hafiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) for the exposure of their work with an acknowledgement of Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology (JPU) as an outlet of their published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.