"An inch of a hook cannot predict the depth of a sea": Why psychology needs more than empirical studies

Authors

  • Karel Karsten Himawan Universitas Pelita Harapan, Karawaci, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu348

Keywords:

empirical study, empirism, evidence-based, literature review, scientific publication in Indonesia

Abstract

Most studies in psychology are built on the evidence-based paradigm, which heavily relies on the objectivity (positivism) as well as integrity and competency of the researchers (constructivism) to interpret the reality. Such a paradigm is often implemented in a reductionistic manner, where all studies in psychology have to employ analysis of primary data. This reflects what currently occurs in Indonesia where most scientific outlets in psychology seem to put much interest on manuscripts that report quantitative and/or qualitative study. In this editorial note, I introduce various possible alternative methods to justify the truth and utility values apart from empirical analysis. This note also informs various practical strategies of the journal to accommodate publication of peer-reviewed, non-empirical work for rapid and accurate dissemination of new knowledge in the field of Indonesian indigenous psychology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bao, Y., Pöppel, E., & Zaytseva, Y. (2017). Single case studies as a prime example for exploratory research. PsyCH Journal, 6(2), 107-109. doi:10.1002/pchj.176

Devany, K., & Poerwandari, E. K. (2020). Integrating cognitive-behavioral therapy and gratitude therapy for treating somatic symptom disorder with schizoid-avoidant personality features: A case report. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology, 7(2), 113-121. doi:10.24854/jpu127

El Hafiz, S., & Himawan, K. K. (2020). Tantangan melakukan kajian literatur psikologi di Indonesia: Masalah mendasar dan solusinya. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.24854/jpu125

Smedslund, J. (2016). Why psychology cannot be an empirical science. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(2), 185-195. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9339-x

Published

2020-10-23

How to Cite

Himawan, K. K. (2020). "An inch of a hook cannot predict the depth of a sea": Why psychology needs more than empirical studies. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 7(2), 111–112. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu348

Issue

Section

Editorial Note

Citation Check