Reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of the Dual Filial Piety Scale
Keywords:
confirmatory factor analysis, dual filial piety model, filial piety, scale adaptationAbstract
Filial piety (bakti) merupakan sebuah konsep yang tidak asing dalam masyarakat di diaspora Tionghoa, termasuk di Indonesia yang masyarakatnya multikultural. Konsep ini menggambarkan dinamika relasi antara orang tua dan anak. Dinamika ini meliputi kepatuhan maupun afeksi yang memotivasi berbagai perilaku, salah satunya adalah merawat orang tua yang kian lanjut usia. Filial piety menjadi sesuatu yang penting untuk diteliti karena berkaitan dengan proses psikologis, baik pada anak maupun orang tua. Salah satu model konseptual yang sering digunakan dalam menjelaskan filial piety adalah Dual Filial Piety Model yang dioperasionalisasikan dalam Dual Filial Piety Scale (DFPS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas psikometrik dari DFPS yang diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Indonesia melalui proses penerjemahan balik. Data didapatkan dari 202 partisipan yang direkrut dengan convenience sampling. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa DFPS versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki reliabilitas dan validitas yang baik. DFPS versi Bahasa Indonesia ditemukan sesuai dengan model teoretiknya. Instrumen ini dapat digunakan untuk penelitian selanjutnya dalam mengkaji konsep bakti pada masyarakat Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Akosah-Twumasi, P., Emeto, T. I., Lindsay, D., Tsey, K., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2021). Restrictive reciprocal obligations: Perceptions of parental role in career choices of sub-saharan African migrant youths. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 576193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576193
Astuti, H. (2021). Berbakti kepada orang tua dalam ungkapan hadis. Jurnal Riset Agama, 1(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v1i1.14255
Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed). Pustaka Pelajar.
Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. H. (2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100
Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. H. (2021). Evolution of the conceptualization of filial piety in the global context: From skin to skeleton. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 570547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570547
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (n.d.). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia daring. Retrieved August 26, 2022 from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/bakti
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modelling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580
Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H., & Tang, D. (2007). Decomposing filial piety into filial attitudes and filial enactments. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00230.x
Chong, A. M. L., & Liu, S. (2016). Receive or give? Contemporary views among middle-aged and older Chinese adults on filial piety and well-being in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2015.1131619
Ha, T., Różycka-Tran, J., Jurek, P., Thu, T., & Hao, L. (2020). Vietnamese version of the Dual Filial Piety Scale: preliminary validation in a student sample. Health Psychology Report, 8(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2020.95409
He, L., van Heugten, K., Perez-Y-Perez, M., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Issues of Elder Care among Migrant Workers in Contemporary Rural China: Filial Piety Redefined from a Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2021.1926203
Ho, Y. F., & Lee, Y. L. (1974). Authoritarianism and Attitude toward Filial Piety in Chinese Teachers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 92(2), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1974.9923111
I’anah, N. (2017). Birr al-Walidain: Relasi orang tua dan anak dalam Islam. Buletin Psikologi, 25(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.27302
International Test Commission (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (second edition). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org
JASP Team (2024). JASP (Version 0.18.3) [Computer software].
Kao, H. F. S., McHugh, M. L., & Travis, S. S. (2007). Psychometric tests of Expectations of Filial Piety Scale in a Mexican‐American population. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(8), 1460–1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01639.x
Kwan, K. L. K. (2000). Counseling Chinese peoples: Perspectives of filial piety. Asian Journal of Counseling, 7(1), 23–41.
Lestari, M. D., Stephens, C., & Morison, T. (2023). Local knowledge and unliveable narratives: How insights from family caregiving narratives can inform locally relevant ageing policy. Journal of Aging Studies, 64, 101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101102
Lim, A. J., Lau, C. Y. H., & Cheng, C. Y. (2021). Applying the dual filial piety model in the United States: A comparison of filial piety between Asian Americans and Caucasian Americans. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 786609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786609
Lum, T. Y. S., Yan, E. C. W., Ho, A. H. Y., Shum, M. H. Y., Wong, G. H. Y., Lau, M. M. Y., & Wang, J. (2016). Measuring Filial Piety in the 21st Century. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(11), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815570664
Pan, Y., Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2022). The relationship between filial piety and caregiver burden among adult children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatric Nursing, 43, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.10.024
Pearson, R. H., & Mundform, D. J. (2010). Recommended sample size for conducting exploratory factor analysis on dichotomous data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1288584240
Różycka-Tran, J., Jurek, P., Olech, M., & Dmochowski, T. (2021). A measurement invariance investigation of the Polish version of the Dual Filial-Piety Scale (DFPS-PL): Student-employee and gender differences in filial beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713395. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713395
Schumaker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed). Routledge.
Schwartz, S. J., Weisskirch, R. S., Hurley, E. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Park, I. J., Kim, S. Y., ... & Greene, A. D. (2010). Communalism, familism, and filial piety: Are they birds of a collectivist feather?. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021370
Shi, J., & Wang, F. (2019). Three-dimensional filial piety scale: development and validation of filial piety among Chinese working adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01040
Soenens, B., Park, S. Y., Mabbe, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Chen, B., Van Petegem, S., & Brenning, K. (2018). The moderating role of vertical collectivism in South-Korean adolescents’ perceptions of and responses to autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01080
Sringernyuang, L., Stephan, M., Torut, B., Wongjinda, S., Chaimongko, U., & Wongjinda, T. (2020). Thailand: Case Studies of Filial Piety, Family Dynamics, and Family Finances-Unexpected Findings of a Country-Wide Research of The Evaluation of Project Performance Supported by Older Persons Fund. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(1),145–158.
Sumari, M., Baharudin, D. F., Md Khalid, N., Ibrahim, N. H., & Ahmed Tharbe, I. H. (2019). Family Functioning in a Collectivist Culture of Malaysia: A Qualitative Study. The Family Journal, 106648071984433. http://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719844334
Sumaryanto, T. O. (2021). Berbakti kepada orang tua sebagai jalan menuju kedewasaan diri: Refleksi teologis Amsal 1:8-19. Vox Dei: Jurnal Teologi & Pastoral, 2(2), 156–169.
Tan C. S., Tan S. A., Nainee, S., Ong, A.W.-H., & Yeh, K. H. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Filial Piety Scale (FPS-M) for adolescents in Malaysia. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2018.29
Tsao, WC., Yeh, KH. (2019). Indigenous Implications and Global Applications of the Dual Filial Piety Model: A Psychological Re-conceptualization of ‘Xiao’. In: Yeh, K. H. (Ed.), Asian indigenous psychologies in the global context (pp. 195–219). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96232-0_9
Vidiarama, M. A., Qomaruzzaman, M., & Hasani, R. N. (2019). Motif penghukuman dalam cerita rakyat Indonesia dengan pesan moral berbakti kepada orang tua. Prosiding Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/1083
Woo, J. (2020). The myth of filial piety as a pillar for care of older adults among Chinese populations. Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20200012
Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215—228. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00122.x
Zarzycki, M., Seddon, D., Bei, E., Dekel, R., & Morrison, V. (2022). How culture shapes informal caregiver motivations: a meta-ethnographic review. Qualitative Health Research, 32(10), 1574–1589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732322111035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dicky Sugianto, Andrian Liem, Nurtaty Sinaga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) for the exposure of their work with an acknowledgement of Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology (JPU) as an outlet of their published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.