Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to examine gender and age measurement invariance of the Indonesian version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS-ID). Participants were 1,922 individuals aged 16-26 years (M = 20.835, SD = 2.284). The measurement invariance of the Indonesian version of the SWLS was tested using multi-group analysis. The research showed there was gender and age measurement invariance of the SWLS-ID based on metric and scalar invariance. Also, the SWLS-ID did not have measurement bias due to group differences. Thus, the SWLS-ID can be used to compare life satisfaction scores between gender and age groups in the Indonesian sample.

Keywords

adolescents adults life satisfaction measurement invariance SWLS dewasa invariansi pengukuran kepuasan hidup remaja

Article Details

How to Cite
Muttaqin, D. (2022). Gender and age invariance of the Indonesian version of Satisfaction with Life Scale. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu438

References

  1. Akhtar, H. (2019). Evaluasi properti psikometris dan perbandingan model pengukuran konstruk subjective well-being. Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.29-40
  2. Bacro, F., Coudronnière, C., Gaudonville, T., Galharret, J. M., Ferrière, S., Florin, A., & Guimard, P. (2020). The French adaptation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Factorial structure, age, gender and time-related invariance in children and adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2019.1680359
  3. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  4. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541
  5. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
  6. Jang, S., Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., Lapierre, L. M., O’Driscoll, M. P., Sanchez, J. I., Spector, P. E., Poelmans, S. A. Y., Abarca, N., Alexandrova, M., Antoniou, A.-S., Beham, B., Brough, P., Carikci, I., Ferreiro, P., Fraile, G., Geurts, S., … Woo, J.-M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale across 26 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(4), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117697844
  7. Muttaqin, D., Yunanto, T. A. R., Fitria, A. Z. N., Ramadhanty, A. M., & Lempang, G. F. (2020). Properti psikometri Self-Compassion Scale versi Indonesia: Struktur faktor, reliabilitas, dan validitas kriteria. Persona:Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 9(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v9i2.3944
  8. Ortega, M. L., Castro, S. T., & Carrasco, O. R. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0573-9
  9. Sierra, J. o, Solana, R. A., de Luis, E. C., Nalda, F. N., & Pedrero, E. F. (2019). Subjective well-being in adolescence: New psychometric evidences on the Satisfaction with Life Scale. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1360179
  10. van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740