The meaning of rohani in Protestant Christian teenagers and adults through photo elicitation

Authors

  • Evans Garey Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Indonesia
  • Anita Novianty Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu1273

Keywords:

photo elicitation, Protestantism, religiosity, rohani

Abstract

The term rohani is used by individuals in Indonesia to refer to the human soul or spirit. However, scientific studies on the meaning of rohani remain limited, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of this contextualized concept. This study involved Protestant Christian teenagers and adults (n = 26), with ages ranging from 15–68 years. A qualitative approach was employed using the photo elicitation method, and the data were analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings identified several primary themes of rohani meaning, including personal experiences, people-relationships, nature, religious activities, and places of worship. In addition, several emergent themes were identified, such as symbols, moral values, cues, and self-care. These findings suggest that the meaning of rohani not only reflects individuals’ efforts to seek the sacred or the divine, but also relates to an orientation toward personal well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Cue. APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/cue

Bacquet, S. (2017). Religious symbols and the making of contemporary religious identities. In R. Sandberg (Ed.), Religion and legal pluralism (pp. 113–132). Routledge.

Badan Pusat Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (n.d.). Rohani. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Daring. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/rohani

Bates, E. A., McCann, J. J., Kaye, L. K., & Taylor, J. C. (2017). “Beyond words”: A researcher’s guide to using photo elicitation in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1359352

Bowen, D. H., & Cheng, A. (2016). Losing my religion? The impact of spiritual cues on noncognitive skills. Journal of Catholic Education, 20(1), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.2001072016

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Garey, E. (2021). Religious, spiritual, or rohani? A study on Google Trends. In H. J. E. Wiyanto, I. I. Rasikawati, S. A. Yuyun, S. Mursita-Putri, H. Winoto, I. A. Soenandi, J. Josephine, & P. D. Omega (Eds.), Main conference proceeding of the 2021 International Multidisciplinary Conference on Productivity and Sustainability (IMPS): New trends and approaches in higher education (pp. 16–17). Ukrida Press. http://imps2021.ukrida.ac.id/pubs/online-source

Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally and Company.

Harper, D. (2002). Visual studies talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345

Hill, P. C., Pargament, K. I., Hood, R. W., McCullough, M. E., Swyers, J. P., Larson, D. B., & Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00119

Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Katarina, K., & Darmawan, I. P. A. (2019). Alkitab dalam formasi rohani pada era reformasi gereja dan implikasi bagi gereja pada masa kini. Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan Kristiani, 3(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.33991/epigraphe.v3i2.85

Lipka, M., & Gecewicz, C. (2017). More Americans now say they’re spiritual but not religious. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/06/more-americans-now-say-theyre-spiritual-but-not-religious/

Novianty, A., & Garey, E. (2020). Memahami makna religiusitas/spiritualitas pada individu dewasa muda melalui photovoice. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 8(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v8i2.2115

Othman, M.F., Noh, M.A.C., Lubis, M.A., & Hassan, W. N. S. W. (2017). Pendidikan rohani berasaskan sains Al-Quran. Research Journal on Islam and Civilization, 1(1), 64–77.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.

Poerwandari, E. K. (2017). Pendekatan kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku manusia. Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi (LPSP3), Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267

Streib, H., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2016). Understanding “spirituality”—Conceptual considerations. In H. Streib & R. W. Hood Jr. (Eds.), Semantics and psychology of spirituality: A cross-cultural analysis (pp. 3–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_1

Tanudjaja, R. (2018). Spiritualitas Kristen dan apologetika Kristen. Literatur SAAT.

Thomas, G. (2010). Sacred pathways. Zondervan.

Tillich, P. (1958). The religious symbol. Daedalus, 87(3), 3–21.

Vassenden, A., & Anderson, M. (2015). Religious symbols on rearview mirrors: Displays of faith or hopes for safe travel? In R. R. Williams (Ed.), Seeing religion: Toward a visual sociology (pp. 85–102). Routledge.

Williams, R. (2015). Why study religion visually? In R. R. Williams (Ed.), Seeing religion: Toward a visual sociology (pp. 192–200). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

Garey, E., & Novianty, A. (2026). The meaning of rohani in Protestant Christian teenagers and adults through photo elicitation. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 13(1), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu1273

Issue

Section

Original Research

Citation Check