Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to explore academic learning behavior of undergraduate students in Yogyakarta. Participants in this study were 509 undergraduate students in Yogyakarta, employed using purposive sampling. Design of this study was qualitative content analysis, which combined the use of open-ended questionnaire and interview. The result suggested five core elements of learning behavior: learning strategies, break activities, learning contents, learning preparation, and social element of learning. Among the elements of learning behavior in these findings, break activities were likely to be an interesting distinctive finding in the context of this study because they have different orientations with other elements. Such a finding can be used as a reference to improve the concept of learning that incorporates information technology in a way that it is not viewed as a distraction, but as an essential part of the break activities in the learning process.

Keywords

aktivitas selingan belajar akademik persiapan belajar strategi belajar unsur sosial dalam belajar academic learning break activity learning preparation learning strategies social element of learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Kristiyani, T., & Faturochman, F. (2021). The exploration of academic learning behavior: A study of undergraduate students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu426

References

  1. Afif, A., & Kaharuddin, F. (2015). Perilaku belajar peserta didik ditinjau dari pola asuh otoriter orang tua. Auladuna, 2(2), 287–300. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/auladuna/article/view/883
  2. Awla, H. K. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23
  3. Aunurrahman, A., Kurniawati, T., & Ramadhiyanti, Y. (2013). Exploring Indonesian college students strategies in learning english language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 4(2), 4–13. https://www.awej.org/images/AllIssues/Volume4/Volume4Number3Sept2013/27.pdf
  4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029
  5. Bhatti, R., & Bart, W. M. (2013). On the effect of learning style on scholastic achievement. Current Issues in Education, 16(2), 1–5. http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1121
  6. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Study process questionnaire manual: Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED308199
  7. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
  8. Byrnes, J. P. (2008). Cognitive development during adolescence. Dalam G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (hlm. 227–246). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756607.ch11
  9. Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
  10. Chiesi, F., Primi, C., Bilgin, A. A., Lopez, M. V., del Carmen Fabrizio, M., Gozlu, S., & Tuan, N. M. (2016). Measuring university students’ approaches to learning statistics: An invariance study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915596125
  11. Chiţiba, C. A. (2012). Lifelong learning challenges and opportunities for traditional universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1943–1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.408
  12. Chua, B. L., Tan, O.-S., & Liu, W. C. (2016). Development and validation of the Problem-Based Learning Process Inventory (PBLPI). New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 19(1), 20–40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211395.pdf
  13. Dattalo, P. (2008). Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford University Press.
  14. Duff, A. (2004). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040461
  15. Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183
  16. Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273
  17. Firmansyah, M. A. (2017). Analisis hambatan belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2036
  18. Gibbs, G. (2005). Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  19. Griesemer, J. A. (2014). Using social media to enhance students’ learning experiences. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 3(1), 8–11.
  20. Gündüz, N., & Özcan, D. (2010). Learning styles of students from different cultures and studying in Near East University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.107
  21. Hardianto. (2014). Identifikasi permasalahan belajar mahasiswa program studi pendidikan biologi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pasir Pengaraian. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(2), 81–88. https://www.neliti.com/publications/59133/identifikasi-permasalahan-belajar-mahasiswa-program-studi-pendidikan-biologi-fak
  22. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Sage.
  23. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  24. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
  25. Irvine, J. (2017). A comparison of revised Bloom and Marzano’s new taxonomy of learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 33, 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161486.pdf
  26. Kaya, T., & Bicen, H. (2016). The effects of social media on students’ behaviors: Facebook as a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.036
  27. Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self‐regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. Tesol Quarterly, 48(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.129
  28. Kristiyani, T. (2016). Self-regulated learning: Konsep, implikasi dan tantangannya bagi siswa di Indonesia. Sanata Dharma University Press.
  29. Kristiyani, T., & Faturochman, F. (2018). Students’ perspectives on concepts, factors, and models related to the attainment of achievement. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i1.2022
  30. Laal, M. (2011). Lifelong learning: What does it mean? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(May), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.090
  31. Ma, X., & Wang, J. (2001). A confirmatory examination of walberg’s model of educational productivity in student career aspiration. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120090821
  32. Marambe, K. N., Vermunt, J. D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of student learning patterns in higher education. Higher Education, 64(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10734-011 -9494-z
  33. Markovi´, S., & Jovanovi´, N. (2012). Learning style as a factor which affects the quality of e-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 38(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9253-7
  34. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
  35. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Corwin Press.
  36. McCombs, B. L. (2017). Historical review of learning strategies research: Strategies for the whole learner—A tribute to Claire Ellen Weinstein and early researchers of this topic. Frontiers in Education, 2, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00006.
  37. Murti, W. (2019). Pengaruh perilaku belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar IPA Biologi siswa kelas VIII SMPN 4 Bantimurung. Jurnal Binomial, 2(1), 54–63. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/binomial/article/view/185
  38. Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/328888
  39. Pai, H.-H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10648-0 14-9260-8
  40. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(2), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
  41. Pelton, J. A. (2014). How our majors believe they learn: Student learning strategies in an undergraduate theory course. Teaching Sociology, 42(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14542351
  42. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  43. Sears, D. A., & Pai, H. H. (2012). Effects of cooperative versus individual study on learning and motivation after reward-removal. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.602372
  44. Sears, D. A., & Reagin, J. M. (2013). Individual versus collaborative problem solving: Divergent outcomes depending on task complexity. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9271-8
  45. Short, E. J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. Dalam C. B. McCormick, G. E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research (hlm. 33–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8838-8_2
  46. Susetyo, Y. F., & Kumara, A. (2012). Orientasi tujuan, atribusi penyebab, dan belajar berdasar regulasi diri. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(1), 95–111. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/10.22146/jpsi.6969
  47. Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129109
  48. Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1510
  49. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
  50. Tsai, M.-J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374300_The_Model_of_Strategic_e-Learning_Understanding_and_Evaluating_Student_e-Learning_from_Metacognitive_Perspectives
  51. Turingan, J. P., & Yang, Y.-C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of self-regulated learning skills between Korean and Filipino college students. Asian Social Science, 5(12), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n12p3
  52. Tus, J. (2020). The influence of study attitudes and study habits on the academic performance of the students. IJARW1382 International Journal of All Research Writings, 2(4), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13093391.v1
  53. Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172925
  54. Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2016). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
  55. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292