Innovative behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu4Keywords:
leader behaviors, expected performance outcomes, inovative work behaviorAbstract
Innovative work behavior has the aim to improve the performance and competence of the organization in achieving its goal. As a perspective of organizational behavior, the innovative work behavior is the interaction between the individual, group process and organizational processes, which affects the range of leadership behaviors and performance expectations of employees when the realization of innovative work behavior is completely done. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of leadership behavior through the mediation of performance expectations, in revealing the individual’s innovative work behavior. The population study was a group of companies on transportation and logistics business lines involving 199 employees. One is a holding company and the other nine are affiliate companies. Sampling design used is Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling. Measurements used De Jong-IWB (Innovative Work Behavior). Data collection and analysis of research data used path analysis. The results showed the value of total effect = 0.47 which suggests that there is direct or indirect effect between leadership behavior, and the performance expectations of innovative work behavior as a mediator.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Achua, C.F., & Lussier, R.N. ( 2010). Effective leadership. Canada :Cengage Learning International Offices.
Ajzen, I., & Fishben, M. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50,179-211.
Baron, R.A., Byrne, D., Johnson, B.T. (1998). Exploring social psychology. Boston: Allyn And Bacon A Viacomm Company.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D., (2010). Measuring inovative work behavior. Journal of Creativity And Inovation Management, 19, (1) , 23 – 36.
Fonseca, J. (2002). Complexity and inovation in organizations. London:Routledge.
Franken. R.E. (2002). Human motivation : Growth Motivation & Self Regulation. USA: Wadsworth
Thomson Learning.
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen : The key to japan’s competitive success. Japan: The Kaizen Institute, Ltd.
Nahavandi, A. (2009). The art and science of leadership. New Jersey :Pearson Education, Inc.
Rank, J., & Nelson, N,E., & Allen, T.D. (2009). Leadership predictor of inovations and tasks performance: Sub ordinates’ self esteem and self presentation as moderator. Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 465-489.
Robbins,S.P., Judge.T.A. ( 2009). Organizational behavior. London:Pearson Education Ltd.
Sugiyono.(2003). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Ulrich. D. (1997), Human resource champion: The next agenda for adding value and delivering result. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
West, M.A. & Altink, W.M.M., (1996). Inovation At Work: Individual, Group, Organizational And Socio Historical Perspectives, European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 5, (1) , 3-11.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W., (2010).Innovative behavior in the work place: The role of performance an image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53:323-341.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
Ajzen, I., & Fishben, M. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50,179-211.
Baron, R.A., Byrne, D., Johnson, B.T. (1998). Exploring social psychology. Boston: Allyn And Bacon A Viacomm Company.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D., (2010). Measuring inovative work behavior. Journal of Creativity And Inovation Management, 19, (1) , 23 – 36.
Fonseca, J. (2002). Complexity and inovation in organizations. London:Routledge.
Franken. R.E. (2002). Human motivation : Growth Motivation & Self Regulation. USA: Wadsworth
Thomson Learning.
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen : The key to japan’s competitive success. Japan: The Kaizen Institute, Ltd.
Nahavandi, A. (2009). The art and science of leadership. New Jersey :Pearson Education, Inc.
Rank, J., & Nelson, N,E., & Allen, T.D. (2009). Leadership predictor of inovations and tasks performance: Sub ordinates’ self esteem and self presentation as moderator. Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 465-489.
Robbins,S.P., Judge.T.A. ( 2009). Organizational behavior. London:Pearson Education Ltd.
Sugiyono.(2003). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Ulrich. D. (1997), Human resource champion: The next agenda for adding value and delivering result. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
West, M.A. & Altink, W.M.M., (1996). Inovation At Work: Individual, Group, Organizational And Socio Historical Perspectives, European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 5, (1) , 3-11.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W., (2010).Innovative behavior in the work place: The role of performance an image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53:323-341.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
Downloads
Published
01-01-2012
How to Cite
Soebardi, R. (2012). Innovative behavior. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 1(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu4
Issue
Section
Original Research
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Rusdijanto Soebardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) for the exposure of their work with an acknowledgement of Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology (JPU) as an outlet of their published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
